Here are some famous folk born on October 2: Mahatma Gandhi,
comedian Bud Abbott, Avery Brooks( that velvet-voiced actor who played as the
commander of Deep Space 9), Sting, Groucho Marx... All have helped, in their
own ways, to make the word a better or at least nicer place, even if only to
make us laugh or sing along.
But today's post is about King Richard III, the subject of a lot
of books and at least one play, who was born on this day in 1452 and died long
before he could get to my age. I used to be in the Richard III Society, though
I dropped out when it got too hard to pay my membership to England and some
friends who went with me to local meetings had other commitments. But I never
lost interest in the subject.
So, why join a fan
club for a man who has been dead for over five hundred years?
It was because of this book:
When I was in Year 11 at school, I had a wonderful English
teacher. We were studying Richard III by Shakespeare. She was the first teacher
I had had who took Shakespeare seriously enough to discuss it, not just make us
read it at home and show us the film. And one of the things she told us was
that, wonderful as the pay was, it wasn't strictly accurate historically. She
recommended we read Josephine Tey's novel, which I did as soon as I could get
hold of it.
And then, when I was out of school and earning money, I found
and joined the Richard III Society.
I recently got hold of the ebook and started to reread it yet
again last night. I posted about it when I bought it online, but I hope you
don't mind my mentioning it again.
It's the kind of book that stands up to a reread. When I was in my
teens, I didn't realise how long ago it had been written and thought some of
the references confusing, but now that I understand the world of the novel is
different from now, I can just get on with it.
If you haven't read it, it's very simply a police procedural
which never leaves the hospital room where Inspector Grant, the hero of some of
Ms Tey's other books, is stuck with a broken leg he got in the course of his
police duties. He's bored, the books he has been offered to read are not to his
taste and the nurse won't even move his bed around so he can look at a
different part of the ceiling. He is set a challenge: who really DID kill the
Princes in the Tower, if it wasn't Richard? Was Richard really the villain
Shakespeare portrays? Quite apart from the cleverness of setting a mystery
novel in a hospital room, there's the fascination of the research aspect,
something that I, as a librarian and writer of several non-fiction books, can
only approve.
But there's more. The book is timeless, but also a product of
its time, years before the Internet. If Grant was stuck in hospital today, he
would be given a laptop or an iPad and could just google the information
instead of relying on books and an earnest young research assistant to bring
them. In fact, he'd probably, being what he is, demand and get his paperwork!
There would be no story. :-)
I read my way through quite a bit of Richard III-themed fiction
over the years, as well as the non-fiction books. There were some other
mysteries, such as Jeremy Potter's A Trail Of Blood. The author was part of the
Richard III Society, so would have an obvious bias in Richard's favour, but it
made a fascinating mystery novel in its own right. The novel is set in the time
of Henry VIII, who is about to close down the monasteries. A monk is sent on a
search for a possible surviving Yorkist heir, in hopes that the heir, once
found, might depose Henry and save the monasteries. It leads him through the
story of Richard and his times.
There was one by Sharon Penman, who has since gone on to write
about other English rulers, The Sunne In Splendour. That one is definitely for
fans of the thick-as-a-brick historical saga, but is better than most of those.
One writer I discovered early on in my Richard III fan reading
was Rosemary Hawley Jarman. Her novel,
We Speak No Treason, kept me on the edge
of my chair. Here's what the author had to say about her book in 2011, on the
40th anniversary of its publication, on her
website.
It's been a long time since I read it and I'm not sure how I would feel about it on a reread, but there's
no doubt that it hooked me in at the time, with the beauty of the language and
the descriptions - I could shut my eyes and picture every stitch of embroidery
in the clothes, every banner fluttering from the towers, hear the music and the
trumpets. The novel has a number of viewpoints - the Nut Brown Maid, Patch the
court fool and the Man of Keen Sight. The girl falls in love with Richard and
becomes pregnant with his daughter before being sent off to a convent(the
daughter, Katherine, was a real person). Patch is not sure how he feels about
Richard, but becomes loyal. The
Man of Keen Sight is an archer whose family appear again in another novel, The Courts
Of Illusion, about Perkin Warbeck.
This novel was the one in which I first discovered Sir Edward
Brampton, who was a real person, a Portuguese Jew who came to England and
became a major member of Edward IV's court. He is only a minor, though
important figure in this novel, but I became interested enough to look him up
and wasn't he a character! In the novel, he is a dignified figure. In real
life, he was much more colourful. Think cheeky Errol Flynn. The really
interesting thing about him is that this loyal servant of Edward IV and Richard
III(who knighted him) managed to charm Henry Tudor into welcoming him back to
England, where he lived happily ever after. When you think of some of the things Henry did to many of those who had served Richard, that's quite an achievement!
Rosemary Hawley Jarman gives him an important task to do for
Richard at the end of the novel, but I won't tell you what it is in case you
want to read the novel.
I believe Ms Jarman is now writing fantasy. Interesting
indeed...