Today I will talk about a few hugely popular books which didn’t do much for me. I’m not saying they were bad, just not for me.
In no special order, here we go.
Twilight. I read it because the girls using my library were reading and loving it. To be honest, I found it dull; not much happened till well into the book. I couldn’t bring myself to read the next one.
BUT - I bought two sets of the series for my library, because I saw kids reading it all over the school. They read it curled up on steps outside, if the classrooms and library were not open yet. They read it and passed it on by word of mouth. Only the girls, true, apart from one boy I saw carrying his copy around. I well remember another boy who had read it complaining that instead of going up in flames in the sun, as they should, these vamps sparkled, dammit!
But the thing is, here was a book which was exciting readers - even non-readers were giving it a go. My librarian soul shouted for joy.
I remember a member of my lunchtime book club who told me it was the first book she had ever read, back in Year 5. She was now a passionate reader, as I knew.
Another student, an ESL girl, read all four books in as many weeks. She told me that she simply read at home. She did housework, then read. She skipped family events to read. If she didn’t know a word, she figured it out from the context, or from the dictionary if she couldn’t get the context. Mind you, that was just her - she was a bright kid we lost to the private system when she got a scholarship. But the series inspired her to read hard words, and learn more English from it.
Next, Throne Of Glass by Sarah J. Maas. The story involves the world’s greatest assassin, a teenage girl, who is competing for the job of King’s Champion -not as you may imagine, the one who fights on his behalf, but more like official royal assassin!
This one was getting poor reviews when I read it, and I should tell you that I thought it was not as bad as everyone was saying. However, I also found it rather silly, and the descriptions of the fighting and climbing the heroine does really needed beta readers with some expertise in those areas to see if they were possible.
However, the author went on to become hugely popular(still is) and my female library users were asking for the books in this series, and others she was writing, so I bought them. My library was there for the kids’ benefit, not mine, after all. I don’t judge. The books were not racist or sexist, as far as I could see and I left it to be recommended by word of mouth, as I really couldn’t.
Divergent by Veronica Roth. The heroine is a girl in a society where they have a version of the Hogwarts Sorting ceremony, only it’s not in a boarding school, it’s how you live your life. The girl comes from a family which expect her to join their “house”, but she chooses another one, Dauntless, the equivalent of Gryffindor...
Hugely popular, oh, yes, and it was turned into a series of films, and I was one of a minority who didn’t care for the original book and certainly didn’t read the rest. I didn’t mind it, even gave it a reasonable review. I just couldn’t read the rest, and I was dubious about whether or not the system could possibly work.
Interesting that in this novel, the villains were in the equivalent of Ravenclaw! Says something about the author’s attitude to intellectuals, doesn’t it? Plus, the head baddy had the very villainous name of Janine... a bit like Marion Zimmer Bradley giving her Merlin character the distinguished name of Kevin.
The DaVinci Code by Dan Brown, the only adult title on this list. I read it out of curiosity, since so many people I knew were making a fuss over it, and ended up very glad it was a library book. I’m sure you have read about it, even if you haven’t read the book, so I will skip the details. It involved Jesus and a quest for secret papers and a lot of running around, with baddies from a church group that actually exists.
Quite honestly, I thought it was a perfectly good thriller of the airport-reading type, the kind you buy before a long flight and get rid of when you reach your destination. I’ve never seen the movie and don’t want to. However, it might have sold a lot fewer copies if the Church hadn’t made such a fuss about it that aroused readers’ curiosity.
My main issue with it was that it was set over about 24 hours, during which time nobody ate, slept or went to the bathroom. Okay, I know that the third on my list is rarely mentioned in any book, but you would think that the main characters would at least eat and sleep! Not only didn’t they rest, but they were quite fresh and prepared to fight the baddies near the end!
Maybe it’s a thing about airport thrillers, but I have read at least one other where everyone did take rest breaks, and it was still exciting, so no excuse!
Okay, these are a few of mine, what about you? Do you have some books that everyone else loved and which you found “meh” at best? Did you enjoy the books I mentioned?
Okay, never heard of Throne of Glass, so no comment on that one. Haven't read Divergent either, although Heckle has the series and I have been planning on reading it eventually.
ReplyDeleteBut I have read Twilight and Da Vinci Code. While I thought the writing was poor in Twilight, it hooked me in. And the rest of the series was stronger. I borrowed Twilight from the library but ended up buying a boxed set through the school's Scholastic book club when it was cheap.
You've described Da Vinci code perfectly - an airport read. But I didn't mind it. I have read other Dan Brown books since. Usually picked up at second hand sales and then returned to them. It wasn't a "can't put down" book, but definitely okay.
A bestseller that I thought didn't live up to the huzzah was 50 Shades of Grey
(an adult book, but the best example of this I have). I also thought the first of the Hunger Games books was amazing (read it through until the wee hours of the morning), but not the rest of the series (and 2 was better than 3).
My 2 cents anyway :)
I would like to say that I never read a book that didn't appeal to me by the end of the first chapter. But that was clearly not true with novels set by the English staff at high school - all students had to finish them, whether they books were wonderful or not.
ReplyDeleteIn Old Man and The Sea, an old Cuban fisherman endlessly struggled with a giant fish out at sea. It was hopeless and (to me) senseless. And we had to read Great Expectations by Charles Dickens which I also thought was full of strange behaviours.
Hi Hels! Ah, well, a book you had to read for school is a different kettle of fish! I’m betting that a lot of American kids HATED the Hemingway book, judging by comments I’ve read on Goodreads. And yes, Pip is not a sympathetic character. Or, as my sister put it, “Pip is a little shit!” But there are books everybody seems to love except me...
ReplyDeleteHi Anita! Twilight certainly hooked the students in, which is why I bought two sets for the library. And it turned one of my students into a reader and improved the English of another. Good enough for me! I just found it boring.
ReplyDeleteI didn’t mind Da Vinci Code either, I just didn’t think it worth all the fuss.
I’ll take your word for 50 Shades, not planning to read it. I must be one of the few who loved ALL the Hunger Games books; you’re not Robinson Crusoe there! 😁
I must confess that I haven't read any of the books in this post. I did, however, see the movie of "The Da Vinci Code" and enjoyed it.
ReplyDeleteI am not among the fans of the Harry Potter books. I read the first one and was unimpressed. I recognize that if I had been a 10 year old girl when I read it, I would probably have become a Super Fan of the whole Hogwarts phenomenon. But I was an adult in her 40s and it just did not spark anything in me. Not only did I never read the rest of the books, I was also unimpressed by the movies and their child actors. My oh my, I AM a curmudgeon, aren't I?
Hi Debra! So... you saw the films, then, despite only having read the first book and not liking it? 🙂 That was fair of you! You certainly gave it a go.
ReplyDeleteI’m a children’s writer and a school librarian, so I do get something out of children’s books; sometimes I think, well, I didn’t like that, but I’m not the intended audience. In the case of the Harry Potter books, I did like them, and I was intrigued by how carefully she wrote them so that her novels would be growing up with her young readers - from the fourth book on, they were YA. Of course, children now can read the lot without having to wait for the next one to come out. It must be a problem for primary school libraries!
Anyway, if you are interested, here is a post I wrote about my discovery of the series, rather than try to say it all in one comment. Cheers!
https://suebursztynski.blogspot.com/2012/07/happy-birthday-jk-rowling.html
I've not read most of the books you mention as I wasn't drawn to them. I tend to be guided by reviewers I trust. Too often I've read books 'cold' and regretted it - like a recent fantasy for its realistic martial arts scenes...ruined by bad editing and repetitive plotting: A Warrior's Tale by L.T. Suzuki.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I read Throne Of Glass by Sarah J. Maas and enjoyed it - but then I was in an 'assassin' mind-frame at the time. I even read the prequel and shorts Maas released later - plus, I have Crown of Midnight in my bookshelf. But I admit I've read better assassin-based novels - and worse ones. Also, there are more pressing reads and series to tackle - the Witcher books by Andrzej Sapkowski. So far, my most enjoyed recently fantasy series was the When Women Were Warriors books [1-3] by Catherine M. Wilson.
Hi Roland! As a matter of fact, I have just downloaded the first “When Women Were Warriors” book, which was going free for a time. I haven’t read it yet.
ReplyDeleteI haven't read any of them and I have no intention to. Regarding the Twilight "saga", I bloody hate angsty vampires and associating them with romance. I haven't even heard of Throne of Glass or Divergent.
ReplyDeleteHi Guillaume! Ah, but you aren’t a teenage girl, the intended audience for those books, are you? 😁 They love them! If you have had a bad experience reading about angsts vampires, you might like to check out Terry Pratchett’s Carpe Jugulum, which sends them up mercilessly! Of course, he was thinking of Anne Rice rather than Stephenie Meyer, but it still works.
ReplyDeleteI encountered it when I was looking for LGBQT books that presented lesbians and feminism in a positive light. Plus, the series is in many ways following the Heroine's Journey structure - the variation on Joseph Campbell's The Hero's Journey.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Roland! I’ll let you know what I think when I’ve read it. I might even give it a review if I like it.
ReplyDeleteI must confess that I didn't enjoy The Book Thief the first time round. But I did appreciate it more the second time (I had to reread it for my book group).
ReplyDeleteI agreed with you that the Divergent society couldn't possibly work, and that put me off, I didn't bother with the rest. Never touched Twilight. I did read Da Vinci Code and couldn't put it down! But I felt dirty afterwards :)
Oh, I also didn't enjoy Cloudstreet! I will have to hand back my Australian citizenship I think.
ReplyDeleteActually, I loved The Book Thief, novel AND film! A pity the film changed that last scene from Sydney to America.
ReplyDeleteI have never read.Cloudstreet, so can’t comment on it. I did read a story about that book. Tim Winton was in Paris with his manuscript- possibly the only copy at the time. He dropped it! Luckily for him, someone saw and handed it back to him!
I think I actually went to the theatres to see the first Harry Potter movie. I was hoping it would improve my liking for the story. It did not. The rest of the movies I've seen here and there in bits and pieces on TV where they seem to run incessantly. I didn't spend good money on seeing them in the theatres. So I'm not quite as fair as you think, LOL!
ReplyDeleteEach to their own, Debra! Personally, there is one movie I wouldn’t want to spend good money on again and that is the film based - extremely loosely! - on Susan Cooper’s The Dark Is Rising - Americanised as HP would have been if the author hadn’t held out against it - and turning the characters into idiots. In fact, I wouldn’t take the DVD as a gift.
ReplyDeleteOh Sue, I actually have that DVD! (It came with another film I did want). It was TERRIBLE, I lasted about 30 seconds.
ReplyDeleteAgreed, Kate! But I went to see it at the cinema, so I gave it a whole morning I will never get back. The only good thing about it was having Christopher Ecclestone as the Rider. If they had made a decent film of it, I would have been happy to see him in the role.
ReplyDeleteI see you have a new book out, well done!
I do not read a lot of bestsellers. I imagine that a fair amount would be disappointing. Everyone has different tastes.
ReplyDeleteI read The DaVinci Code. I thought that it was entertaining but perhaps it was a little overrated. One of my pet peeves about that book was that I thought that it was very derivative of Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum.
Hi Brian! I agree that DaVinci Code was overrated. I haven’t read the Umberto Eco book or even heard of it! You’ve made me curious, but I think I will read his most famous book, The Name Of The Rose first.
ReplyDelete"Divergent" started out good and then it went downhill (I read the entire trilogy) -- I like your comparisons to Hogwarts :-) And yes: the whole society structure doesn't work, and that's the point!
ReplyDelete"Throne of Glass" was ridiculous (yes, the fight scenes!). I've tried other books by this author and wished I hadn't.
"Twilight" had some sort of magic that captured everyone -- for a short while, at least. If I want thrilling teenage vampire drama, I'll just watch "Buffy the Vampire Slayer".
Hi Ronel! I think a lot of younger folk haven’t seen Buffy. I can remember wearing a t shirt that said, “And then Buffy staked Edward. The End” to tease a Twilight fan at my school, but in recent years plenty would have simply looked at me blankly. Pity, that!
ReplyDelete